We recently wrote about the newly enacted Nevada drug price transparency law here. The law requires manufacturers of prescription diabetes drugs to disclose certain drug cost information to the state Department of Health and Human Services (“Department”). In addition, the law imposes several unique reporting requirements on non-profit patient advocacy groups and pharmaceutical sales representatives. We expected that these reporting requirements would garner some attention and,… More
Tag Archives: confidentiality
Nevada Governor Brian Sandoval recently signed into law a drug price transparency bill, SB 539. The law primarily concerns price transparency measures for prescription diabetes drugs, but also imposes reporting requirements on nonprofit patient advocacy groups and pharmaceutical sales representatives that we’ve yet to see enacted in any other state.
First, the law requires nonprofit patient advocacy groups to annually compile a report disclosing any payment,… More
California’s latest effort at a drug price transparency bill, SB 17, moved one step closer to becoming law on Tuesday when it passed the State Senate 26-10. The legislation, sponsored by Sen. Ed Hernandez, would require the manufacturers of prescription drugs experiencing large increases in WAC to give purchasers 90 days’ advance notice of the increase, and report detailed information to the state Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development (OSHPD). … More
HB 631, Maryland’s first-in-the-nation “price gouging” bill, will become law without the signature of Governor Larry Hogan (R). In a letter to Maryland Speaker of the House Michael Busch (D), Hogan stated that he would not sign the legislation due to concerns that it could violate the “dormant” application of the Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution. However, Hogan declined to veto the legislation,… More
Transparency Legislation Targeting Drug Manufacturers and Health Plans in California Senate Appropriations Committee
One of the more aggressive pieces of price transparency legislation introduced this year is currently before the Appropriations Committee in the California State Senate. Under SB17, manufacturers of drugs that have experienced three-year increases in WAC greater than either 10% (for drugs with WAC over the Medicare Part D specialty drug threshold) or 25% (for drugs with WAC under the threshold) would be required to give 90 days’ advance notice of the increase to purchasers (including state purchasers,… More
The end of the legislative session in Olympia on April 23 did not see the enactment of what had once been among the fastest-moving pieces of drug pricing transparency legislation in the country. After passing the House of Representatives in a close 52-46 vote, HB 1541 was unable to escape from the Senate Committee on Health Care.
HB 1541 would have required manufacturers of prescription drugs that increase in price by 1) the lesser of 10% or $10,000 over a 12-month period;… More
In a lopsided 137 to 2 vote on April 10, 2017, the Maryland House of Delegates passed HB 631, which outlaws “price gouging” by manufacturers and wholesale distributors of certain “essential off-patent or generic drugs.” Price gouging is defined as “an unconscionable increase in the price of a prescription drug.”
The legislation applies to drugs for which exclusive marketing rights have expired,… More
On Thursday, April 20, the Governor Andrew Cuomo signed into law New York’s 2017-18 budget. The budget adds a new section 280 to the New York Public Health Law which requires the Commissioner of Health to set an aggregate Medicaid drug spending growth threshold for 2017 and 2018, and allows the Commissioner to refer drugs to the Drug Utilization Review Board for pricing reviews when the state is projected to exceed the threshold. … More